JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 8, 1993

A- de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Alzate Ceballos Jesus Antonio

✓
Topic · hard data
No Sustentacion De La Impugnacion. Informalidad De La Accion De Tutela.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impugnación Fallo De Tutela
  • No requiere sustentación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ordenó a la Secretaría General de la Corporación remitir el expediente referido al Consejo de Estado para que resuelva la impugnación presentada contra la decisión del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca.

La Corte Constitucional advirtió que no es procedente adelantar la revisión de las providencias proferidas por no haberse resuelto la impugnación formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se remita el expediente de tutela No. 10.433 al Honorable Consejo de Estado para que resuelva sobre la impugnación presentada contra la decisión del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca proferido dentro de la acción de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR esta decisión al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.